We hate him. Which is what he wants. The more we hate him, the more powerful he becomes. It simply amazes me that we haven’t yet figured that out, that this guy has been custom manufactured to destroy America’s influence, if not America itself, and that his greatest tool is our own ignorance and hatred. Obama’s conciliatory olive branches to the Islamic world may make him a target here at home. The greater threat to this nation is not the Islamic extremists but the so-called “Christian” extremists here at home intent on provoking a “holy” war.
For
most of my childhood,
I was convinced I was going to hell.
I grew up in a very conservative apostolic church which taught
me speaking in tongues was the only evidence of the indwelling
of the Holy Ghost and without the Holy Ghost I was lost for
eternity. They taught me belief in Jesus Christ wasn’t enough,
that there needed to be evidence of my faith. For literally
years I attended these all-night tarry services where you beg
and scream and froth at the mouth, pleading with God to save
you. And, when nothing happened, the church mothers would tell
you it’s your fault: that there is some sin in your life that is
preventing this miraculous sign from coming forth. I was scolded
and denounced and dragged back to church again and again. There
were songs I was not allowed to sing. This choir song, “I’m
Saved And I Know That I Am," I was warned to not sing that
because, for me to sing that song was blasphemy and God might
strike me dead. I wasn’t saved. I hadn’t yet broken through, and
my breakthrough was not forthcoming because I was a sinner and a
liar. damned for all eternity.
When I was thirteen years old, I was sent to a summer camp run
by white fundamentalist evangelicals in the Adirondack mountains
where I was told salvation came by faith alone and that I need
only prove that faith to God—not to anyone else. These white
teenagers opened the bible to me—a strange version called the
“Living” bible which was not the cryptic King James. I could
understand their bible, which made me fear it. I couldn’t trust
their bible because it was written in plain language and was
easy to comprehend. So they opened my own bible, an authorized
King James with children’s pictures in it, and showed me. “For
by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves:
it is the gift of God…” [Ephesians 2:8] “Believe on the Lord
Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house. [Acts
16:31]. Salvation, these folks said, came simply by repentance
and belief. Becoming born again had nothing to do with spiritual
gifts.
It took them nearly two weeks to convince me that I was born
again, that I’d become a child of God the moment, the very
second, I’d chosen to seek Him and invited Him into my life. The
religious ignorance was so deeply embedded in my DNA, I was so
devout and so orthodox a Christian, that I’d actually begun
hating myself and blaming myself, even as I pointed fingers and
sent others to hell.
This is how religious fanaticism works. Religious fanaticism is
most often anti-intellectual and anti-educational because
education is seen as The Great Satan. Only religious training,
usually at the hand of other fanatics, has any truth or value,
and that training is threatened by an unfiltered stream of
information. Information from outside of our orthodox
belief—even Christian information—was considered blasphemous and
idolatrous: tricks of the enemy. We trusted only our pastor,
whom we worshipped as we worshipped God Himself. We gave him all
of our money and all of our time and we never questioned a word
he said. We questioned only our lying eyes when we saw him
enriching himself on our offerings, driving luxury cars and
carrying on with women. To question the pastor was to question
God himself.
The church of my youth had a practice of sending deacons, in
pairs, to sit in cars outside of members’ homes on surveillance
watches of suspected fornicators and adulterers. I was required
to be at the church five days a week to set up and break down
the church’s P.A. system and musical equipment, to help sweep up
and wash the pastor’s car. I and many others were virtual slaves
to a cult, working our way to heaven by frying chicken and
mopping floors. We’d arrive at church at around ten a.m. Sundays
and would be wailing away in prayer, again, begging God for His
forgiveness and pleading with Him to save us. The pastor would
come strolling in sometime around noon, a deacon carrying his
briefcase, and he’d go into his office and eat breakfast and
read the paper, coming out around one p.m. where he’d spend a
half hour with pastoral observations before beginning his
rambling, disorganized sermon—which usually comprised of two
hours of screaming at us and telling us what miserable wretches
we were. We’d be done somewhere between three-thirty and four
p.m., at which point we’d take a dinner break and be required to
be back in prayer no later than six. The pastor would then
stroll back in sometime around seven thirty and begin the
evening service, which would let out around ten p.m.
This was church to me. This was who God was: a vengeful, selfish
god who’d given me over to this evil, fat, selfish, lying
bastard.
Sadly, this nonsense, or some form of it, goes on to this day.
Many people, within the reach of these words, still worship
their pastors—which offends God. Still equate suffering with
good works, even when that suffering is mostly about lining the
pastor’s pockets. Still view oppression and misogyny as somehow
godly. The main reason for this is simple: a lack of education.
Most people stuck in religious cults—even Christian cults, which
is what these oppressive, tin-pot regimes actually are—remain in
bondage to these ignorant, evil men (and women) because they
themselves know nothing about the bible and lack a proper
foundation for spiritual discernment. In other words, most of us
are simply lazy and don’t read. Worse than not reading the bible
is not studying the bible. It’s not enough to read it: you’ve
got to study it. You’ve got to understand the context, both
theological and historical, to understand what God is saying to
us, what Paul is saying to us and, most importantly, the
difference between the two. 90% of Christian cults rely on the
ignorance of their adherents to keep going, which is why they
fight so hard against education or information from outside of
their cult. The adherent is trained to listen only to the
pastor, to read only the materials the cult hands out, and to be
wary of outsiders and outside teaching.
Welcome to the world of radical Islam.
This is a culture most westerners do not understand. Islam
includes many religious practices. Adherents are generally
required to observe the Five Pillars of Islam, which are five
duties that unite Muslims into a community. In addition to the
Five Pillars, Islamic law (sharia) has developed a tradition of
rulings that touch on virtually all aspects of life and society.
This tradition encompasses everything from practical matters
like dietary laws and banking to warfare and welfare. Almost all
Muslims belong to one of two major denominations, the Sunni
(85%) and Shi'a (15%). The schism developed in the late 7th
century following disagreements over the religious and political
leadership of the Muslim community. Islam is the predominant
religion in much of Africa and the Middle East, as well as in
major parts of Asia. Large communities are also found in China,
the Balkan Peninsula in Eastern Europe and Russia. There are
also large Muslim immigrant communities in other parts of the
world, such as Western Europe. Of the total world Muslim
population, about 20% live in the Arab countries (where Muslims
comprise majority populations, with Christian and other
religious minorities of differing sizes by country), 30% in the
countries of the Indian subcontinent, and 15.6% in Indonesia
alone, which is the largest Muslim country in absolute numbers.
[Wikipedia]
President Obama, who spent part of his childhood in Indonesia,
underscored his personal connection with Muslim culture and said
the United States seeks "broader engagement" with the Muslim
world than just the fight against Al Qaeda. "We will listen
carefully, we will bridge misunderstanding, and we will seek
common ground. We will be respectful, even when we do not agree.
And we will convey our deep appreciation for the Islamic faith,
which has done so much over centuries to shape the world —
including in my own country," Obama said. "The United States has
been enriched by Muslim Americans. Many other Americans have
Muslims in their family, or have lived in a Muslim-majority
country — I know, because I am one of them." He added: "This is
not where East and West divide — this is where they come
together." [Fox News©]
Changing America's Intolerant Tone:
The speech white racists continue to characterize
as "Obama's Apology Tour."
Islam In Black & White
I don’t know if black people understand Islam any more than
white people do, but I would guess most black Americans have a
higher comfort level with their Muslim neighbors than most white
Americans do. I would speculate that most urban blacks have a
personal relationship with at least one person of Muslim faith,
and that that person is welcome in his home, at his place of
business, and, yes, at his church. I have friends and relatives
who are members of the Nation of Islam. I have no quarrel with
them. I do not believe them to be evil or violent, and, despite
the schism in our religious beliefs (see Isaac And Ishmael,
above), we are not in conflict with one another. Both Islam and
Christianity have roots in Abrahamic monotheism (faiths which
recognize a spiritual tradition identified with Abraham), but
Islamic tradition denies the deity of Jesus Christ and holds
that Jews and Christians distorted the revelations of God by
either altering the text, introducing a false interpretation, or
both. I am willing to guess I am likely much more comfortable
around persons of Muslim faith than many whites who not only
have no Muslim friends but no black friends. In the Nation of
Islam they see only violence and hate, in spite of the fact the
Nation tends to serve the community even moreso than many
Christian groups do. But this is the Republican (if not the
American) party line: Muslims are evil, dangerous people out to
kill us, an irrational fear and hatred that is every bit as
wrong as those taught in Islamic madrassas all over the globe:
America is evil and dangerous and out to kill us.
So, how do we stop this idiocy? President Barack Obama will
likely be harshly criticized for turning down the anti-Islamic
rhetoric this country has grown accustomed to. While claiming to
embrace “our Muslim citizens and neighbors,” President George W.
Bush has, singularly, caused more harm and death to civilian
noncombatants in the Muslim world than all other U.S. presidents
combined. He has also done more to empower radical elements in
the Islamic world than any other president, simply by virtue of
his lack of education about Islamic culture.
For more than four decades, the United States, in particular,
has misread and demonized this culture, perhaps most notably
with the Iranian hostage crisis where radical Islamic students
took over an American embassy on November 4, 1979, holding 50
U.S. citizens hostage until President Ronald Reagan was sworn
into office on January 20, 1981. America being a land of cowboy
movies and John Wayne, the nation embraced Reagan’s simplistic,
black-and-white distortion of the complex issues surrounding
that protest action—which I am not here to defend other than to
state its origins were far more complex than simply “bad” people
taking “good” people hostage. The United States had, for
decades, backed a corrupt and repressive regime in Iran, which
created the environment for religious extremists to gain favor
among the Iranian people.
The worst thing an oppressive dictator can do is neglect
education. Yet, most petty dictators do exactly that, buying
bullets instead of books. Education is the most powerfully
motivating force of any society because, what we learn shapes
what we believe. The U.S.-backed Iranian Shah jailed and
murdered dissidents and spent more time and money shooting
people than educating them. As a result, impoverished Iranians
could turn only to religious schools, called madrassas, for free
education. Only the madrassas, like my old, ignorant pastor,
provided limited education along narrowly strict religious
guidelines, and usually provided that education only to boys.
These fundamentalist schools taught a radical interpretation of
the Holy Quran in the context of a warped a political view of
America. The Shah was evil, America backed the Shah, therefore
America was evil. And America has spent nearly half a century
proving these teachers right.
The Iranian hostage crisis has been described as the "pivotal
episode" in the history of U.S.-Iranian relations. The notion
that America is evil has so taken root in the Islamic world that
I don’t harbor much hope we, as a nation, will ever overcome it.
George Bush’s unnecessary and tragically unproductive “war on
terror” has cost a hundred thousand Islamic civilian lives
[http://www.iraqbodycount.org/]. Even worse, it has created
perhaps millions of Islamic orphans who may have possibly hated
America before we killed their parents, but certainly despise us
now. Millions of orphaned boys and girls who have sworn oaths to
destroy America. Sleepers, waiting to grow old enough to find
the opportunity to kill as many Americans as they can.
This gathering storm is the product of our own ignorance and
racism. Our own hatred of non-white, non-Christian people. I’m
sure this goes farther back than the Shah and Ayatollah
Khomeini, but the Iranian hostage crisis is certainly where the
notion of Islam = evil came from. Islam is not evil. Islam has
never been evil. Islam is a religion of peace. It denies the
deity of Jesus Christ and is, therefore, not a faith I can
embrace, but the faith, in and of itself, is not evil. Conflict
between Muslims and Jews and, to a lesser extent, Muslims and
Christians, is, however, part of biblical prophecy [Genesis
16:12], a conflict which I fear will go unresolved until
Christ's second coming.
It is important that we, as Christians, keep our eye on the
ball. That we model the personal example of Jesus Christ, who
took issue more with Jews than with non-Jews. Christ's harshest
words were for religious phonies who claimed to love Him.
Quarreling with Muslims (or Buddhists or atheists for that
matter) is not our job. Our job is to show God's love and to
proclaim His truth. It is in that service that I respectfully
disagree with my Muslim brother without hating him and without
disrespecting him, as many radical Christian extremists tend to
do. Ours is not a Holy War against Islam, as I believe George
Bush espoused. Our struggle is against principalities and powers
of darkness, a struggle won easily by our simply being the
people God wants us to be. There's a theory out there that
former president Bush acted to hasten the Armageddon. That some
part of his vision—what little he may have had—of the Middle
East was evangelical: to bring peace by means of weapons of war
and remake the Middle East into western-style democracy.
Whatever merit such an idea might have, it is childish and
dangerously naive, the idle thoughts of a dilettante. The
quarrels in western Africa (what we euphemistically and perhaps
racistly call the "Middle East") are centuries old, deeply
embedded into the region's DNA. Those conflicts will outlive us
all. The only real solution to any of it is God sorting all this
out. Between now and then, the best anyone can hope for is that
which is so severely lacking on all sides of the equation:
patience, respect and compromise: three qualities often lost in
the rhetoric of religious fervor.
Are there evil people who embrace Islam, who use Islam, to
further their political purposes? Absolutely. But what makes
those guys materially different from the late Jerry Falwell or
even Jim Dobson? A religious zealot is a religious zealot. The
only difference are the rules of his particular hustle. But, are
all Christians bigoted, reactionary, ignorant repressive nut
jobs? No. But, isn’t that how most of us are seen by
non-believers?
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the charismatic President of Iran, dresses
in western clothes and usually speaks in rational, even tones
that seem reasonable to the Islamic world. His youthful
appearance appeals to the moderate and liberal Muslim youth,
even though Ahmadinejad unquestionably represents the political
position of the religious leaders who actually run Iran. Many
see Ahmadinejad as The Great Satan, the antichrist, because he
comes from the East, because he is so charismatic and seemingly
reasonable. He is the perfect front man for Islamic extremism
because he himself does not come across as extreme. He comes
across as rational, with sober and reasonable complaints against
western governments. Complaints America has a hard time
dismissing, if only because Ahmadinejad understands the language
of diplomacy and the power of the media. He is a creature of the
powerful Muslim clerics whose goal is not at all secret: to
depose the Vichy governments in the Mideast (including the royal
family running Saudi Arabia) and purify the holy lands of their
ancestors. This includes wiping Israel off the map, which is,
perhaps, America’s second concern after our number one reason
for even caring what happens there—Mideast oil.
They'll Like Us Better When We Win: A brilliant argument against cowering from radical Islam.
Religious Extremism's Best Friend
In terms of the mission of Islamic extremism, George Bush has
been the best friend Islamic extremists could ask for. His Iraq
war—which has killed at least 30 times as many innocent
non-combatants as were killed during 911 and has created
millions—with an *M*—of radical Islamic zealots—has done more to
advance the goals of radical fundamentalism than any radical
cleric. War is good business for extremists, be they Muslim or
Croatian or Catholic. People get killed. Extremists can then
rally the faithful, playing on their loss and misery. America
still seems to have this insane notion that, because we have the
atomic bomb, we can do whatever we want. Ahmadinejad’s most
powerful weapon against the United States is his rationality.
His reasonableness. His smile. His unassailable complaints
against us. He’s not frothing at the mouth, ranting and
accusing. And we hate him. Which is what he wants. The more we
hate him, the more powerful he becomes. It simply amazes me that
we haven’t yet figured that out, that this guy has been custom
manufactured to destroy America’s influence, if not America
itself, and that his greatest tool is our own ignorance and
hatred. The worst thing we could do is shoot this guy. Or nuke
Iran. Or whatever other nutty Bush-era solution we arrogantly
presume will solve this problem.
Truth is, there may be no solving of this problem. This is not a
political problem but a cultural one. It is deeply embedded in
the DNA—theirs and ours. We see them as ignorant and evil,
therefore we continue to stumble ass-backwards through the
region, offending and murdering innocents. Which only empowers
the extremists who pray, each and every day, for an opportunity
to set off a nuke in midtown Manhattan.
President Barack Obama’s conciliatory olive branches to the
Islamic world may make him a target here at home. The
irrational, rednecked ignorance growing here at home frightens
me a lot more than Ahmadinejad does. I’ve had many conversations
with people who hate—hate—Obama. I disagreed with President
Bush. I didn’t particularly like President Bush or his policies.
But I didn’t hate him. Former Vice-President Dick Cheney has put
a face to Obama Hatred, a grass-roots movement I find terribly
disquieting. I pray for the president’s safety every day
because, the same vile, ignorant, irrational evil we complain
about in the Islamic world exists here at home. Barack Obama may
be the best shot we’ve had in a very long time at diffusing the
hostility between the U.S. and the Islamic world, and our own
home-grown extremists despise him for it.
Obama’s rock star power likely supersedes Ahmadinejad’s charm.
Obama is not likely to fall for Ahmadinejad’s “Gosh, me so
rational” façade, but the president is also not likely to simply
hate the man on spec, either. If Jesus taught us nothing else,
He taught us hatred gets us nowhere [James 1:19-20]. Our
strongest weapon against radical Islam is not our weapons of war
but our commitment to peace.
I find it simply horrifying that the greater threat to this
nation is not the Islamic extremists but the so-called
“Christian” extremists here at home who invoke racist violence
against our own president in order to perpetuate hatred and
murder in some naive oil-grab or, worse, religious “holy” war.
Which is not to suggest we give Ahmadinejad the keys to Disney,
either. Only that we've spent a decade using hate, death and
violence to solve a cultural problem the bible itself says won't
be solved until Christ returns. Maybe it's time for a more
enlightened approach. People who despise the qualities of
God—love, patience, joy, peace—are simply evil. No matter what
they call themselves.
Christopher J. Priest
17 May 2009
editor@praisenet.org
TOP OF PAGE