It’s taken me a long time to accept this, but the truth is
there’s nothing I do or say that some of my neighbors won’t
receive in a negative way or interpret in a negative light.
They don't understand me. They're not trying to understand me.
They don't know my story and they've never seemed interested in
knowing anything at all about me beyond what might be available
on a sex offender registry or a criminal records search. So much so that,
after a decade of trying, I’ve just given up. I no longer make
any effort to know or be involved with these people. Hi and bye.
Which is alien to me, almost intolerable. It's not my way, not
my behavior. During snow emergencies, I've gone door-to-door
checking on the seniors, Are you okay? Do you need anything?
I used to routinely shovel their walks, offer to help with
whatever they were doing. And there'd be this grace period where
we'd all sort of get along, and then something--seemingly,
anything--would happen, some incident, some behavior, and these
same people I'd invested time and energy caring for would
immediately, without hesitation, presume my part in whatever
episode may be was somehow evil if not criminal. And it finally
wore me down, this pattern of now I'm your neighbor, now I'm a
suspect. Thirteen years and I am still not trusted, still looked
upon with suspicion, and these people still, in an eye blink,
think the worst of me, to comical extremes like a Seinfeld
episode, like I've been waiting more than a decade to hatch my
evil plan. He took Harry's pen.
Ordinarily, I'd say these people are lunatics. But they're
not. They're not crazy, they're not even evil. They're just
people, mostly older people, who don't do change well. Despite
more than a decade of my presence, I still represent change. I
am still associated with whatever negative experiences they've
had with black people, despite the fact I've never once done
anyone here any harm. That I am quiet and, frankly, fairly
invisible. The moment I poke my head out the door, somebody
around here is accusing me of something, usually something
ridiculous.
My liberal white
friends think racism is rednecks in white hoods. Racism is some
of my
neighbors always assuming the worst about me while never, and I
mean not once, asking my side of any dispute. They don’t talk to
me, they talk to each other, come to their conclusions about
what I’m about or why I put my trash can over there instead of
over there, and govern themselves accordingly. Some have amassed
a long list of perceived slights and neighborhood crimes I've
committed, a long history of bad behavior on my part that is
largely a product of their paranoia because they literally do
not talk to me. They don't have the first clue about who I am or
why I do (or don't do) anything. They don’t see their process as racism, but they also don’t
stop to note there’s no one else on the block who's earned that
level of scrutiny.
Racism in today's America is rarely about white hoods. That kind of
racism is easy to see and to target, and most every white person
I know—even the most obviously bigoted—deplores the extremist
types. That denunciation of overt racism forms the basis of
our self-image: I’m not racist, I hate the KKK. But racism
isn’t about the KKK. It’s about not talking to me. It’s about
comforting and encouraging a white youth who rode his skateboard
two blocks over to threaten me with violence. Now, this lady
down the street didn’t know this kid
threatened me and that his threat was the reason I called the
sheriff; she just saw I’d called the sheriff and assumed I was
harassing this fine young man. Now, if this white kid had put
his hands on me and I’d shot him, would I be acquitted like
George Zimmerman? I’ve lived near this woman
for thirteen years. Did she stop, for even ten seconds, to even
wonder what was going on or why I’d call the sheriff on this
kid? No, she just assumed the worst; that I, for some psychotic
reason, chose to harass some teenager I'd never seen before in
my life, who came onto my street and approached me
but somehow I was bothering him. And she embraced the teen, part of a pack of wannabes
around the corner who hang out, smoke dope, drive unlicensed, unregistered
vehicles at 70 mph through the subdivision, get drunk and
shoot pistols in the middle of the night, and then began
screaming at me—as is her
practice—from the safety of her front
yard, “Why don’t you just move! Just MOVE!!”
If I called that behavior racism, the neighbors would be up in
arms. But this is what actual racism is: the kind of
irrationality that rationalizes unreasonable behavior. It is,
after a fact, an act of violence, screaming at me, standing in
the street screaming at my house. Why don't you just MOVE! It's
hatred, and this from a woman who claims to be a Christian
while loudly claiming I am not. I am determined to show this
woman, and those like her, love and forgiveness, as Jesus loved
and forgave me. If they are reading this, I'm sure my simply
writing about their behavior will enrage them and then the
denials, I don't do that! Yes, yes you do. No one is hitting me.
No one is shooting me like Trayvon. But theirs are, nonetheless,
acts of violence.
True racism flies well under the radar of otherwise good
people who behave in irrational ways when it comes to
persons of color. Like a computer virus, it infects everything they
are and everything they do, but goes completely unnoticed by
them. They get highly insulted by anyone pointing out their
irrational behavior fits the pattern of a racist. They go on
offense, becoming ever more blatantly racist in their virulent
defense of their racist behavior.
For me, the lesson of Trayvon Martin is George Zimmerman’s
adamant refusal to admit his own tribal predisposition toward
racism. We all have it, myself included. Anyone who says he
doesn’t is a liar; someone completely lost in the snow globe of
their self-deception. I wouldn’t hate George Zimmerman if he
admitted his racism; I’d think he was just like everybody else.
The people on my street who interpret everything I do in the
most negative way possible are just George Zimmermans waiting to
happen. On some level I am convinced my life will end when some
lunatic with a gun—everyone in Colorado has a gun—shoots me not
for something I’ve done but, like Trayvon Martin, for something they assumed I was up to. Trayvon Martin was walking home, and
George Zimmerman interpreted that as a criminal act which
justified his stalking an unarmed teenager with a loaded gun. I could be out watering
my lawn and there are people on this street who would interpret
that as a hostile act toward them. I give up. Hi and bye. That’s
it.
It’s not the hatred or even the persecution, it’s the denial
that is so dangerous. It’s the lunatic judge who barred any
mention of race from the trial. What planet does this judge live
on? It’s the inexplicable jury, five out of six of whom were
white women with no possible means of understanding who Trayvon
Martin was. It was the now-clearly racist “stand your ground”
law that protects Zimmerman while missing the point it was Trayvon
Martin who was being threatened and Trayvon Martin who
chose to stand his ground. And these clueless white women convicted
Martin of assaulting Zimmerman while letting Zimmerman free for
murdering Martin. That is racism. That is the institutionalized
evil that devalues a black life. Why couldn’t
Marissa Alexander
stand her ground? She didn’t shoot her abusive husband, but
shot a ceiling, and was given twenty years—it seems
inexplicable—in prison. Why is there a different standard for a
black woman who fired a warning shot than for Zimmerman who
fired into the heart of a 17-year old child?
I really didn’t want to talk about this this week, but this is
all anyone’s been talking about. Even the president has been
shoved off of the headlines in the wake of the disastrous, sad,
illogical verdict of perhaps the most idiotic, clueless jury in
human history. On one hand, though, I can say that now I know
how White America felt after the OJ verdict. White America has
castigated the OJ jury for letting an obviously guilty man go
free while missing the point that, by the letter of the law, the
jury
had to acquit Simpson because the evidence had obviously been
tampered with and the lead investigator, Mark Furhman, was
caught in a lie. The standard is, if there is reasonable doubt,
the defendant must be excused.
The same was true of Zimmerman. It really wasn’t the jury’s
fault so much as the prosecution’s failure to remove doubt. The
judge omitting the dozens of 911 calls Zimmerman made
previously, all of them false alarms about black men and teens.
The judge insisting no mention of race be allowed, even though
this case was all about race and race formed the basis of Trayvon
Martin’s life experience and speaks directly to explaining his
motivation. Much like the majority of jurors, the judge was a
white woman whom I sincerely doubt could identify in any
appreciable way with Trayvon Martin. Judge Debra Nelson laid out an
even playing field that exists only in the minds of white
people. There is no even playing field in America. It is
unrealistic and extremely anti-intellectual to presume such,
There is this guy’s experience and that guy’s experience. Only a
fictional baseline life experience—belonging to neither
party—was allowed in that courtroom, which pretty much acquitted
Zimmerman before the trial even began. Given the hand they were
dealt, following the judge’s instructions and letter of the law,
that jury was left with little choice but to acquit.
The acquittal of George Zimmerman was a punch in the face to
every African American, to every person of color, in the United
States. What small hope the OJ verdict gave black America that
justice can be bought by anyone, regardless of color, was dashed
by the Zimmerman verdict, which inexplicably and shockingly made
it all right for an obvious racist to stalk the target of his
ire with a loaded gun, provoke a fight, then shoot him dead. That’s the message,
sent to and received by Black America: We Don’t Count. Most
people legally carrying concealed weapons are whites. Most of
them are paranoid types like the lady down yonder who screams at
me for no reason. There simply is no justice in this country for
black people, period. We’ve known this all along, yet OJ gave us
hope. Black America was not high-fiving because we thought OJ
was innocent. That celebration had much less to do with whether
or not he was innocent, which was rather besides the point. The
elation among African America was that, for once, the criminal
justice system worked the way it claims it does, that a black
man was found to be equal under the law, The evidence was
tampered with, Furhman lied: that was proven beyond a reasonable
doubt, which created reasonable doubt about OJ, which, like it
or not, required his acquittal. That event was a punch in the
face to White America. Zimmerman was ours. We should not blame
the jury or, even the system. We should blame ourselves for
laying on the sofa in 2010 and not bothering to vote, which
allowed the lunatic fringe to vote in a virtual army of crazies
to state and federal offices. This is the crowd that passed
these so-called “Stand Your Ground” laws. We’re mad about it,
but where were you on election day, 2010? In ’08, we had record
black turnout. In 2010, we stayed home, the paranoid old folk
and freaks came out, and it’s been gridlock and chaos in
Washington ever since. Who did that? We did.
Now we’re all pissed off about Trayvon. But we’re too stupid or
too lazy to connect the dots between our own failure to be
responsible and the breadcrumbs leading to that tragedy. “Stand
Your Ground” exists because we couldn’t be bothered in November,
2010. Because we let the lunatics win. “Stand Your Ground” is a
lunatic law. George Zimmerman is a lunatic. And now he’s back on
the street, with his gun, looking for the next Trayvon.
Racism is tribal. It’s in the genes. It’s not going anywhere,
but can only be bred out of successive generations. We have a
long road ahead for the fringe to die out and for their kids, or
perhaps their great-great-grandkids to stand up and lead. Every
black man, woman and child in America knows What Really Happened
that night in April. The Zimmerman judge barred culture at the
door, ignorantly missing the point that even a lack of culture
is, in fact, a culture. She obviously sought to normalize the
proceedings by barring any discussion of race. She, like far too
many liberal whites—both friend and foe—failed to realize that
barring the discussion takes substantial evidence—both for and
against Zimmerman—off the table. She committed the proceeding to
be seen only in the light of White Middle Class America, the
American Gothic which is considered the benchmark norm. But, as
I point out in this essay, that norm does not exist and hasn’t
existed for a long time. We, all of us, white and black, keep
pretending it exists and that it is out baseline standard for
defining “normal.” It’s not. And, by insisting only white
culture be allowed in her courtroom, this judge slanted the
trial in Zimmerman’s favor.
Like some of my neighbors, she’ll never see or understand that
concept. She has no idea and accepts no responsibility for the
reality that Black America has now lost significant faith
in the criminal justice system. We know, walking through those
doors, that who we are and what motivates us as human beings is
unwelcome and that justice, which is supposed to be blind, most
certainly is not. “Fucking coons…” Zimmerman muttered under his
breath, captured on a 911 tape. But race was not allowed. Racism
is apparently allowed everywhere but in America's courtrooms,
where it is evidently and empirically denied to exist.
Christopher J. Priest
21 July 2013
editor@praisenet.org
TOP OF PAGE