Madam President
What's At Stake In The 2008 Election
The default position is to accuse me of backing Obama
because he's black, which you can only do if you
don't know me very well. If Barack Obama was
running the same kind of loathsome, exploitative
and, yes, evil campaign that McCain has been
running, I'd be calling him out on it just as
strongly. Alan Keyes, a conservative black
Republican who ran for president in 2000, is a
right-wing extremist nut (and, I've said so) who
has also said very hurtful and untrue things
about Barack Obama. Which is, likely, mostly out
of jealousy as Obama's candidacy is viable while
Keyes has mostly existed on the periphery as a
Republican asset; Keyes being The Black Guy You
Invite to Republican functions to prove how
inclusive they are. Cynthia McKinney, the Green
Party nominee, is a self-absorbed demagogue
whose shameful grandstanding over her assault of
a Capitol Police officer for asking her for her
ID pushed more urgent and ultimately tragic news
of two missing black boys off the air (and,
thankfully, ended her political career).
To suggest I would not or do not go after black
politicians or black leaders is ridiculous.
There is no partisanship, here: McCain has run
an evil, write this down someplace, evil,
campaign. He has run the Old School GOP playbook
that turns neighbor against neighbor, brother
against brother, husband against wife, and, most
certainly, black against white. His campaign has
weakened this country rather than strengthened
it. And he can huff and puff and blame Obama all
day long for not taking public financing or for
not agreeing to a bunch of town hall
meetings—both of which would have evened the
playing field for McCain—but, at the end of the
day, nobody forced John McCain to base his
entire argument on hate and fear. This is the
choice he's made, this is the bed he must lie
in.
I struggle to remain as objective as I can be,
but not expressing my disappointment at lies—and
that's what they are, lies—and hateful tactics
just makes me the hypocrite. Not pointing this
stuff out requires me, by default, to campaign
for John McCain by doing what Focus and other
Christians are doing: seeing what they choose to
see, compromising and even slandering the very
Gospel they claim to embrace by turning a blind
eye to sin in order to accomplish a political
goal. I remain shocked by the Christian right's
self-induced chronic myopia, that they'd sell
out Christ's principles in His name. That
winning is more important than our ethics and
even our dignity. Pastors: we should not be
organizing to defeat ballot amendments or elect
candidates. But we should be organizing to tell
people about Jesus, and to live lives worthy of
His sacrifice. In order to do that, we need to
be an informed people, and we need to speak out
against lies, against injustice.
Then, pastors, having prepared our flock, we
need to get out of the way and let each of us
make our own choice.
Legally Blonde: Palin's candidacy would not make a credible empty-head chick comedy.
Nobody Doesn't Like Sarah P.
McCain released an ad citing past praise from Obama, and
mailers including Hillary Clinton's image and praise for McCain.
Responding Friday, Obama said he respected the unsuccessful 2000
primary campaign McCain Obama waged against then-Gov. George W.
Bush. Obama noted the Arizona senator's stand then against
negative political attacks. "I admired him for it," Obama told a
crowd of 25,000 in Des Moines. "He said, 'I will not take the
low road to the highest office in the land.' Those words were
spoken eight years ago by my opponent John McCain," Obama said.
"But the high road didn't lead him to the White House then, so
this time he decided to take a different route," which Obama
assailed as "slash-and-burn, say-anything, do-anything
politics." In the Republican's ad titled, "Obama Praising
McCain," Team McCain highlights Obama's past praise for the GOP
nominee's stance on global climate change. In another new ad
titled, "Freedom," McCain reminds voters about his military
service and how it shaped him. "I've served my country since I
was 17 years old and spent five years longing for her shores. I
came home dedicated to a cause greater than my own," he says.
"Don't hope for a stronger America. Vote for one. Join me."
[Daily News]
McCain is still working the military hero pedal on the organ,
but he's still not making it relevant to his leadership
qualifications (as opposed to qualities). This is a spectacular
bungle on the McCain campaign's part—it's strictly amateur hour
to keep exploiting McCain's POW status (which potentially
alienates many who have also so suffered for our country)
without the ad explaining, in real terms, how that experience
qualifies McCain for leadership. So far as his personal
qualities go, his sacrifice for America is laudable and inure to
his quality as a person, as a human being. But, being held
captive and tortured says nothing about his qualification to
lead.
Even now, in the ninth hour, McCain is still not talking about
what, specifically, he plans to do as president. Barnstorming
the nation, his strategy in the home stretch—in the face of the
failure of his mean-spirited, hateful campaign—is more hate,
more attacks. McCain now spends every waking hour being negative
and attacking the frontrunner with increasingly harsher and more
ridiculous rhetoric, much of which tends to splash back on
McCain himself (most recently, the nonsense about Khalidi—further
evidence of the McCain camp's shoot-from-the-hip improvisational
style). Meanwhile, new reports are awash in campaign leaks that
claim Sarah Palin has "gone rogue," ignoring the McCain
campaign's directives, making huge political blunders (Khalidi,
fruit flies, keeping the $150 thousand wardrobe issue alive),
while forging an exit strategy from a doomed campaign which will
position Palin for a 2012 presidential run (it is to laugh).
None of which is to suggest McCain won't win on Tuesday. It
would be a huge mistake for anyone to count him out. In a
fascinating article on Newsweek's site, political analyst
Jonathan Alter games out a scenario for a McCain win, one in
which the polls, the electoral math and the statistics are all
mostly irrelevant. In Alter's nightmare scenario, "In the end,
the problem was the LIVs. That's short for "Low-Information
Voters," the three fifths of the electorate that shows up once
every four years to vote for president but mostly hates
politics. These are the 75 million folks who didn't vote in the
primaries. They don't read newsmagazines or newspapers, don't
watch any cable news and don't cast their ballots early. Their
allegiance to a candidate is as easily shed as a T shirt.
Several million moved to Obama through September and October;
they'd heard he handled himself well in the debates. Then, in
the last week, the LIVs swung back to the default choice: John
McCain. Some had good reasons other than the color of Obama's
skin to desert him; many more did not. In October, a study by
the Associated Press estimated that Obama's race would cost him
6 percent. The percentage was smaller, but still enough to give
the presidency to McCain."
My nightmare scenario is black folk lying on the couch all day
instead of voting. Or, finding their polling paces jammed packed
because they waited 'til the last minute to go down there,
sucking their teeth and going to the mall instead, perhaps
figuring Obama's going to win anyway, so why bother. Time and
again, God has opened doors for people—all people. We, the black
community, have historically, time and again, taken hard-won
freedoms, freedoms our fathers and their fathers bled and died
for, for granted. As Chris Rock might say, I'm quite sure black
people will come out to support Barack Obama (and a few will
certainly support McCain). Niggers, on the other hand, will lay
on the couch, guzzling Olde E while lighting blunts off one
another. In fact, I'd guess a great many blacks have
registered—many for the first time. Niggers, on the other hand,
missed the deadline and become threatening and histrionic,
blaming da white man when asked about it, I fo'get what day it
wuz. This is a dichotomy white America, and most certainly the
Republican party, either does not understand or for whatever
reason refuses to engage: black people are not homogenous. We
are a plurality. We are a diversity of opinion, of worldview, of
culture. Black people don't like niggers any more than whites
do.
I tend to suspect all the statistical analysis going on is
mostly a waste of time: come Election Day people will, in
overwhelming measure, vote much the way children vote on which
snack to have for recess. They will make an intuitive decision,
most of whom having not read or learned nearly enough to make an
informed one. Black folk will tend to vote for Obama, white folk
will tend to vote for McCain. Informed white folk—Democrat or
Republican—will likely favor Obama, but many of those votes will
not be a vote for Obama so much as a vote against Sarah Palin,
as John McCain's questionable health make her a de-facto
co-presidential nominee moreso than a vice presidential
candidate. But the human wave out there will be, as Alter
gloomily speculates, the Low Information Voter who hates to read
and is bored by politics. I'll bet you can name at least ten of
these people off the top of your head. You can tell who LIV's
will vote for just by what neighborhood they live in and,
sometimes, by what car they drive. They are, for the most part,
lemmings who will simply go with the default or, worse, make up
their mind inside the voting booth (assuming they actually get
there). Maybe this benefits Obama, but it likely won't.
This is why it is so terribly important to not take this
election for granted, to not blow it off or trust the polls that
predict an Obama landslide. These LIV people are out there. They
are clueless and, even worse, not terribly invested one way or
another. And they have just as much say November 4 as you do.
Not only should you get your lazy butt off the couch, but you
need to be working the phones all day, making sure your friends
and family and loved ones get their lazy butts off the couch.
Don't believe the hype, folks. Or, because of your laziness, in
the midst of one of the worst economic crisis this country has
ever faced, we will be swearing in President Sarah Palin, a
person who is farther to the right than President Bush and not
nearly as intelligent. Beloved: it's up to you.
Christopher J. Priest
2 November 2008
editor@praisenet.org
TOP OF PAGE