Devil's Advocate
Bill Bennett & The Politics of Race
I’ve always admired Bennett,
				a frequent political commentator and analyst. So far as 
				Republicans go, Bennett always seemed rather level-headed and 
				rational to me, often flying in the efface of his more extreme 
				right-wing pals anxious to turn back the clock to Ozzie and 
				Harriet and I Like Ike. I’m tempted to refer to Bennett as a 
				moderate, though I suspect he’s more conservative than he comes 
				across, so I’ll stick to my assertion that he’s at least 
				rational. He’s not a mouth-breather like his buddies to the far 
				right. And, now outside the Beltway spin machine, he’s free to 
				part company with political extremists. Which is why Bennett 
				comes across as both thoughtful and rational. Until last week.
				
				Until he got suckered into an absurdist what-if conversation 
				about lost tax revenue due to the number of abortions since Roe 
				v. Wade (which is utterly ridiculous as, even Bennett himself 
				points out, this hypothesis assumes the aborted people would 
				have been productive citizens and not, say, poor or die by some 
				other means). It was the last call of Bennett’s radio show, and 
				a clearly tired Bennett, ready for a weekend of golf or hedge 
				trimming or whatever he does, got taken for a ride by this 
				caller who clearly wanted to beat the dead horse of Roe v. Wade 
				yet again (Republicans: *please* find another issue. The 
				single-note thing is so played now).
				
				This was a call, a show, a moment in time that would have 
				drifted by, unnoticed to the world at large, and Bennett would 
				be on Pebble Beach (or wherever he goes) sipping Margaritas (or 
				whatever he sips) by now. Until, for reasons I’ll never 
				understand, Bennett decided to change his life forever. Bennett 
				veered off into quoting from the new hot statistics book 
				Freakanomics, to say the book posits that crime is down because 
				abortion is up. Absurd? Sure. But Bennett was still on his way 
				to tee-off because he was quoting the book and not suggesting 
				this himself.
				
				But, Bennett took things a step further.
				
				“But I do know that it’s true,” he said, now speaking for 
				himself, “that if you wanted to reduce crime, you could, if that 
				were your sole purpose, you could abort every black baby in this 
				country and your crime rate would go down. That would be an 
				impossible, ridiculous and morally reprehensible thing to do, 
				but your crime rate would go down.”
				
				And, just like that, Bennett changed his life forever. For the 
				rest of his life, and forever thereafter, this quote will be 
				stapled to Bennett’s legacy. Even the widest stretch of the most 
				liberal lefty finds it difficult to believe Bennett put those 
				words together in quite that way—even if he didn’t mean any 
				racial bias by them. The hurtful bias was there nonetheless.
				
White America always seems shocked
				when these kinds of idiot eruptions happen, the kind of 
				eruptions peppered throughout Bringing Down The House. But, 
				Black America knows those thoughts, those concepts and ideas, 
				remain unspoken in polite conversation but surely are expressed 
				in private. Bennett’s comments did not shock Black America 
				because Black America has always known racism is alive and well 
				in this country, even among intellectuals and liberals who 
				purport to be our friends.
				
				Racism is a lot like sexism in the sense that a woman knows, 
				instinctively, the difference between a man offering her a 
				genuine compliment and a man acting inappropriately towards her. 
				The difference can be as subtle as an inflection, a feeling, a 
				mood, a vibe if you will. Black people instinctively recognize 
				racism because ever black person in this country suffers from 
				racism every single day of their lives. Not every woman is 
				sexually harassed every day of their lives (but, many are), but 
				every single black person in this country is discriminated 
				against in some subtle way every single day of our lives. It is 
				a sad part of our landscape, this curse of Shem, that we are 
				forced to navigate through daily because, what other choice do 
				we have?
				
				And that’s why I refuse to move. It won’t matter where I move 
				to, racism is there. Hatred is there. At least, twenty years 
				from now when I am their age they’ll all be gone and I can 
				finally have a quiet morning around here. But moving and fleeing 
				oppression is silly because oppression, like fog, moves around 
				and non one can accurately predict where it will go or when it 
				will pop up.
				
				Bennett has suffered angry condemnation and his own conservative 
				buddies, already reeling in horror from the absolute mess of 
				things their party’s leader, President George W. Bush, has made 
				of this country, are scrambling to save their own skins and 
				distancing themselves from Bennett as quickly as possible. Which 
				really isn’t fair. Bennett got sucker punched. It’s fun to jump 
				up and down on the guy, but, in context, I understood the point 
				he was trying to make, but realize this country is far too 
				hypocritically involved in burying racism—as opposed to 
				eliminating it—to deal with comments like his.
				
				In the hours and days that followed, Bennett has been given many 
				opportunities to dig himself out, but he only dug himself in 
				deeper, trying to assert some journalist’s creed or some other 
				nonsense:
				
				“I was putting forward a hypothetical proposition. Put that 
				forward. Examined it. And then said about it that it's morally 
				reprehensible. To recommend abortion of an entire group of 
				people in order to lower your crime rate is morally 
				reprehensible. But this is what happens when you argue that the 
				ends can justify the means,” he told CNN.
				
				"I'm not racist, and I'll put my record up against theirs,” 
				referring to Pelosi and other critics. “I've been a champion of 
				the real civil rights issue of our times — equal educational 
				opportunities for kids.”
				
				“We've got to have candor and talk about these things while we 
				reject wild hypotheses,” Bennett said.
				
				“I don't think people have the right to be angry, if they look 
				at the whole thing. But if they get a selective part of my 
				comment, I can see why they would be angry. If somebody thought 
				I was advocating that, they ought to be angry. I would be 
				angry.”
				
				"But that's not what I advocate.”
				
				Asked if he owed people an apology, Bennett replied, “I don't 
				think I do. I think people who misrepresented my view owe me an 
				apology.”
				
It’s insane.
				When you find yourself in a hole, the first rule is to stop 
				digging. Bennett’s assertions about an apology are correct in 
				the pristine sense of journalism and ethics. But that's not the 
				world we live in. Our world is one of visceral reaction to the 
				Band-Aids being tugged off of the festering open wound of 
				racism. The reason so many whites—liberals and conservatives—are 
				trying to bury Bennett is it is easier to bury him than it is to 
				deal with the real problem. If racism no longer existed in this 
				country, if this really was the enlightened society we pretend 
				it is, then Bennett’s clumsy banter would have been dismissed as 
				a silly intellectual argument and not a statement of purpose or 
				veiled hatred of blacks.
				
				The reason Bennett will now be castigated is he must now be 
				scapegoated for this great sin of racism, which this country by 
				and large continues to medicate and bandage up while refusing 
				the strong antibiotics of education and enlightenment. The 
				religious right, the Republicans’ strongest allies, whom this 
				president has both played like a fiddle and sold out, is, 
				incongruously, a monolith of intolerance and, yes, racism. It’s 
				far easier for whites to make it to the upper ranks of large 
				black organizations than it is for blacks to achieve much 
				elevation within the major white conservative Christian 
				organizations.
				
				Many of these organizations continue to want to turn the clock 
				back to Stacey Adams and sweater vests, without realizing or 
				perhaps not caring that the “moral” climate of that era and the 
				evoking of the same in turn evokes a visceral response from 
				blacks who, in that fine and bygone era, had to drink from 
				separate faucets, use separate restrooms and sit well behind the 
				sign marked “Colored Section.”
				
				The pasty, smiling, feel-good right-wing Christian conservatives 
				are all about morality, which means they are anti-just about 
				everything. But, worse, their idea of Christian love and 
				fellowship is Christian love and fellowship so long as you do it 
				on their terms. Blacks are welcome but they are, in fact, 
				welcome to assimilate into their culture, as many if not most 
				major right-wing Christian organizations routinely practice the 
				cultural elimination of entire peoples, taking the scripture 
				about “From one flesh…” (Acts 17:26) to mean, everybody should 
				act like them. Everybody should wear sweater vests and behave 
				the “proper” way.
				
				Bennett is the new foster child for racism because kicking him 
				and ruining his life is much easier than dealing with actual 
				racism. In this politically-correct and over-sensitive world, 
				litigating against men who sexually harass women is much easier 
				than simply training boys better so we educate that behavior out 
				of society. Our problem is not Bill Bennett. Our problem is 
				racism. Our problem is that racism is there, and that Queen 
				Latifah’s movie isn’t quite as absurd today as it was yesterday; 
				that whites still think these things even if they don’t say them 
				in polite company. Latifah simply had her characters saying what 
				she believed much of White America actively thinks each and 
				every day.
				
				Bennett’s blunder was in getting tied up in rhetorical 
				arguments, but his biggest blunder was his saying out loud what 
				many white folks in this country surely believe: that blacks are 
				the major problem with crime in this country. It was a sin of 
				truthfulness; an intellectual getting caught up in his own 
				intellect and assuming the country was further along and better 
				enlightened than it actually is. It was a meaningless, 
				rhetorical, intellectual exercise that Bennett surely should 
				have been allowed to conduct. And, if white liberals and 
				conservatives were truly beyond racial bias, he surely would 
				have. Their stampede to hang him only hammers home the fact 
				racism is alive and well in this country. After all, if it 
				weren’t, so many people wouldn’t be rushing to once again 
				bandage the wound.
				
				Making a scapegoat of Bill Bennett for his perceived racism only 
				makes the job of eradicating actual racism that much harder.
				Christopher J. Priest
				3 October 2005
				editor@praisenet.org
 
				
				TOP OF PAGE








