Grandma's Blackberry
As we surely all know by now, while serving as U.S.
Secretary of State under former President Barack Obama,
Hillary Clinton was ether too selfish or too stubborn or,
frankly, too afraid of new tech to maintain a proper
separation between her work and private electronic
communications. This technophobia snowballed into a
ridiculous (and largely pointless) email non-scandal which
cost her the election. And, frankly, she deserved to lose.
Using her private servers for classified communications was
a politically stupid thing to do and Hillary, a
woman I deeply admire, is surely smart enough to have known
she was putting her political future at risk all for the
sake of having the convenience of (allegedly) “carrying one
device” instead of two. I kind of resent her choice at least
to the extent that it has placed our country’s future into
the hands of perhaps the most ridiculous and immature human
being ever to walk upright.
Senator Bernie Sanders knew, from go, that the Democratic
Party was rigging the election for Hillary Clinton. Now,
it’s important to remember Sanders was not, is still not, an
actual Democrat. Trump, for that matter, is not a
Republican, likely doesn’t understand the difference between
Republicans and Democrats. Trump is only about Trump, and
Bernie likewise acted selfishly—resenting the DNC’s fix
being in for Clinton and thus refusing to get out in time
for his “Bernie or Bust” loyalists to get over themselves
before the election. Millions stayed home or voted for some
independent candidate, thus throwing the election to Trump.
White female voters completely missed the point that,
whether or not the country needed specifically Hillary, the
country desperately needed this moment, one that may not
come again for years, where a woman made a viable candidate
for the U.S. presidency. Whether or not I thought Barack
Obama the best candidate for the job, I’d rather have had an
imperfect first black President than no black president at
all. Hillary was one of them— the suburban white woman. And
they blew it—blew their chance to smash one the last
remaining major barriers to gender equality. They traded
their historic moment in for this nut. It was a stupid and
shameful choice, placing ideology over the nation’s dignity
and being on the wrong side of history.
I must pause here to apologize to the former president for
being so very hard on him on this very web ministry.
As horrible a leader as I believed (and still believe) he
was, Trump makes the man look like Lincoln.
While Black America came together, despite our differences,
in order to rise to the occasion of history, white women
were bamboozled by the pundits into focusing on the tree,
Hillary, rather than the forest. They owed it to themselves,
to their daughters, and to posterity to break that glass
ceiling, and Hillary was and is eminently if not sublimely
qualified to lead this nation. But Female White America chose instead
this egomaniacal reality TV combover whom I severely doubt
even knows the most basic things about governing.
Conservatives and a great number of white women didn't think
about governing, didn't consider the consequences. They
followed their ideology. Every white
woman I’ve seen on the Talking Head circuit bashing Hillary
looked, to me, like an idiot. She’s one of you. You had the
chance to make history, and you blew it.
And, lastly, the fake email scandal— the much ado about
almost nothing. I say almost because, God only knows what intel the Russians or Chinese managed to steal from
Hillary’s email, but, c’mon, those folks likely would have
read her email no matter which account she used. It was a
completely overblown fake scandal, made worse by former FBI
Director James Comey’s ninth-hour reignition of the same
mere days before the election. However, as mad as liberals
were at Comey, c’mon, this was completely Hillary’s fault.
She had her chance, and she blew it simply by being stubborn
and fearful of new tech.
The even larger problem is the U.S. Constitution, which,
despite what you believe, does not grant one man one vote,
but grants each state an equal voice in governing. Which
is to say, Montana, with a population of about a million
people, has exactly the same amount of political power in
the U.S. Senate as California with it’s thirty-nine million.
Yes, California has more seats in the House of
Representatives, but, proportionately, the single Montana
vote for its one million residences carries the political
power as 754,000 Californians. Now, in and of itself, that
doesn’t seem troubling. But, when these sparsely populated
rural states start voting as a bloc, they wield vastly
disproportionate clout in government, maybe 5-10 million
people having political control over ten times as many
people.
No, She Was Not Perfect:
White, middle-class women proved themselves to be both short-sighted and gullible, bypassing their moment in history for
a dangerously narccissictic intellectually disengaged sexual predator. I honestly have no clue, not one, what these people
were thinking. Clinton could not have imagined what her choices would cost her... and us.
Awesome
New York Times columnist Emily Badger wrote in 2016:
We still live with political institutions that have baked in
a distinctly pro-rural bias, by design. The Democratic
candidate for president has now won the popular vote in six
of the last seven elections. But in part because the system
empowers rural states, for the second time in that span, the
candidate who garnered the most votes will not be president.
Rural America, even as it laments its economic weakness,
retains vastly disproportionate electoral strength. Rural
voters were able to nudge Donald J. Trump to power despite
Hillary Clinton’s large margins in cities like New York. In
a House of Representatives that structurally disadvantages
Democrats because of their tight urban clustering, rural
voters helped Republicans hold their cushion. In the Senate,
the least populous states are now more overrepresented than
ever before. And the growing unity of rural Americans as a
voting bloc has converted the rural bias in national
politics into a potent Republican advantage.
“If you’re talking about a political system that skews
rural, that’s not as important if there isn’t a major
cleavage between rural and urban voting behavior,” said
Frances Lee, a professor of government and politics at the
University of Maryland. “But urban and rural voting behavior
is so starkly different now so that this has major political
consequences for who has power.
“And it’s not just in terms of policy outcomes,” she
continued. “This pervasively advantages Republicans in
maintaining control of the U.S. national government.”
All of which has brought us the Donald Trump show, an
administration that is beyond a joke on America led by an
individual every believing Christian should denounce but
far too many do not.
I don’t get that: conservative Christians, always whining
about “morality” in government, voted in lock-step for this
confessed sexual predator and habitual liar; a man who had
never claimed nor demonstrated much in the way of Christian
faith or even simple moral ethics. Why did they do that, and
why are these “Christians” poised to support this guy again?
It’s this odd separation between confessed Christian ethics
and political ideology that finds far too many so-called
“Christians” abandoning Christ in favor of some “moral”
ideology. It seems apparent these “moral” leaders believe
their political agenda is more important than following
Christ. This is my argument for separating “morality” from
theology; the two have virtually nothing to do with one
another, as I wrote years back:
Enforcing Christian values upon social justice and moral
standards seems right but it really isn't. Morality and
spirituality are not one and the same. Morality (the quality of
being in accord with standards of right or good conduct) has no
external or infallible truth to it. Theology (rational inquiry
into religious questions), ideally, should be based on eternal
truths, which have nothing to do with morality per se, other
than that our adherence to these eternal truths forms opinions
we express as guidelines governing our moral conduct. Theology
and morality are hardly one and the same. A decent and moral
idea, rule, or concept can still, in all its purity, transgress
the holiness of a divine God. As such, our sense of morality is
of not much use to God (Isa 64:6). Churches relying on their
sensibilities of what is good, right, and moral to dictate their
interpretation of scripture is, in and of itself, faulty
exegesis. The Church should not be in the business of dictating
morality, but should be proclaiming truths both eternal and
infallible. We, as individuals, having been presented with these
truths, are a people at liberty to embrace or reject those
truths, and our sense of morality is the expression of that
decision.
Christ had no political agenda. There simply is no biblical
model for Christians to even have a political agenda or for
Christ's church (as a body) to
be involved in politics in any way. Jesus signed no
petitions, supported no candidates, held no protests. In
fact, the only biblical contemporary of Christ who mounted
any political protest at all was John The Baptist, who was
beheaded not for upholding the cause of Christ but for his
own foolishness in
getting himself tangled up in the
governor’s business.
.
Suffer The Little Children:
Trump embraces a little girl shortly before taking her health care away.
Minority Report
I hate to be an alarmist but, in the history of this nation
we’ve never seen anything like this: a president clearly
obstructing justice and a Congress eager to help him do it.
This should worry the living hell out of us. Why doesn’t
it? Are we even paying attention?
This is how dictatorships are formed: discredit the free
press (“Fake News”), disenfranchise law enforcement (the
GOP’s ongoing, heated attacks on the FBI and others), and
emphasize ideology over law or even common sense. We now
have a government in power that is systematically
disenfranchising the American public right before our eyes
while we do nothing about it.
The overall passive nature of our politically disengaged
community makes us ripe for exploitation. Too many of us
don’t even bother to vote (another reason Hillary lost; most
of us assumed she had it in the bag so why bother voting?).
Beloved, civil rights are a lot like vacation days: use ‘em
or lose ‘em. With every passing day of the Republicans in
power we are seeing, before our very eyes, important and
hard-won rights being stripped away. Ours is a government
run by a political philosophy which is statistically a
minority opinion, but is held in power by exploiting the
intent of the greatest governing document ever written
because that document was written before there was such a
thing as cars or the Internet. Or indoor plumbing. Or
chewing gum.
I can’t help but wonder how much if any of this is being
discussed from black pulpits across America. No, I don’t
think the church— black or white— should be politically
invested but we, as individuals, need to be politically
aware. We need to be active and informed and make good
choices. At the very least, this extremely dangerous
undermining of our community’s civil rights—voting rights
most especially—and the systematic discretization of vital
institutions of law enforcement and news media should be
terrifying for all of us, regardless of political
persuasion.
The fact America, as a whole, is not up in arms about all of
this fills me with anxiety over what this nation has become
and where it is going. No, Hillary’s Blackberry is not
completely to blame, but she, like the “president” we got
largely because of her choices, surely has not helped us
much.
Christopher J. Priest
1 February 2018
editor@praisenet.org
TOP OF PAGE